Frabjous Day

31 Jan 2011

12 May 2010

Recording the apocalyptic narration, part 01

So a friend was making a short film for an art college project, and asked me to contribute a voice-over-narration-type-thing.

I thought I’d make a blog post on how I went about it.

I have no proper recording equipment; the only microphone I have is a cheap-ass ten-euro-at-Argos mic whose intended use is for shouting at people on webcams. I’m plugging it straight into my computer’s microphone jack.

This does not bode well for sound quality. Those mics are of the minimum acceptable standard for anything, and the mic inputs on computers are notoriously shite - you really need a proper mic preamp if you want a good recording. I suspect this latter point is the source of the noise problems to come.

First comes the question of the script itself. Said friend wrote it, and it was good, but I gave it a few tweaks, because fairly often what seems ok on paper just doesn’t work in speech.

This is an odd phenomenon. On the one hand, having to read something aloud seems to highlight any minor awkwardness in flow or sentence structure - long sentences with big sub-clauses usually just don’t work, for example, because by the time you’ve got to the end of the sentence, the listener can’t remember how it began - but on the other hand, the spoken word is often completely incomprehensible in writing.

I heard somewhere that this first penetrated the public consciousness during the Watergate scandal, interestingly enough. Transcriptions of tape-recorded conversations appeared in newspapers and the like, and people were bloody confused by them - they were just jibberish. How could elected politicians be so inarticulate?

But of course, we’re all like that in speech, because our social interactions are largely understood through body language and inflection in the voice, rather than what we say. I find it very frustrating when people don’t recognise this; my mother, for example, thinks you’re not listening unless you’re staring straight at her.

Anyway, I tweaked a few things, and started trying to get a good sound from the microphone.

Mic placement is everything. The position of the mic, X and Y, is important, because depending on where it is it’ll pick up a different tonal spectrum from your voice. This is something the human ear seems remarkably deaf to. I guess something in the audio processing part of our brain compensates. But microphones can be a lot more senstive to this than you’d think. By placing the mic below you, looking up at the roof of your mouth, you get more high frequencies reflected into it. By placing it higher, you get relatively more bass; this is sort of counter intuitive, as you’d expect the proximity to your chest to increase bass - it doesn’t seem to. Closer to your nose, maybe a more nasal quality.

Also, the distance of the mic from the source is important. For some reason, mics tend to exaggerate distance; if you’re six inches away, you sound like you’re three feet away. If you’re three feet away, you sound like you’re speaking from the wrong end of a cave. To get a good, hard, radio-presenter sort of quality, you need to be really close.

This creates another problem. When you speak right into a microphone, breath noise becomes a real issue. Again, we don’t hear these things in speech, but the microphone sure does. If you’re not careful, every plosive T and P, and every sibilant S and fricative F smacks the mic with twice as much volume as the vowels, and makes for a completely bizarre sound, likely distorting your recording in the process.

Oh, that’s the other problem; you need to control the input volume somehow.

Signal-to-noise ratio is important. The noise, any hiss or hum in the background, is constant, so if you can increase the volume of the main signal - your voice - you can make the noise seem relatively quieter. So the louder the input signal, the better. Until it distorts. The problem here is that you’re sitting on an unfortunate knife-edge; too quiet, and the noise seems too prominent; too loud, and you distort the recording with a big crunch. There are various clever studio tricks to cope with this. I don’t have the ability to use any of them.

I ended up sitting my guitar amp on the table, the mic on top of that (oh I’ve no useful mic stand by the way…), and keeping it a few inches from my mouth. I leaned in and out a little as the voice got softer and louder, respectively.

Next came the actual recording itself.

16 Apr 2010

Very long and brilliant interview with George Carlin. See previous video for who he is…

I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a better interview - it’s fantastic.

16 Apr 2010

George Carlin was a fucking genius. I really must watch more of him.

27 Mar 2010

Vocal…stuff

My sleep pattern has been relatively normal these last few days - I’m getting up in the morning and going to bed at night, shock-horror - but I’ve been getting up very early, so as I write this in the early evening I’m already groggy with tiredness. Doesn’t bode well for a coherent post.

Anyway, I had a bit of a vocal breakthrough today. I now understand something I’d missed previously.

There are various concepts involved in voice production - chest voice, head voice, falsetto, resonance and so on, and something called “vocal fry”, which is a strange term for that sort of croaky sound you can produce in your throat. You know, that really dry croak-thing, without any actual voice behind it. Almost a velcro sound.

Previously, I’d been under the impression that vocal fry was a weird technique that people used more or less to pretend they could sing lower than they could - there’s no volume or projection in the croak, so it’s hardly a real form of speech. It turns out, though, that it’s far more useful than that.

I’ve posted before about getting a deeper sound from my voice, and concentrated on some sort of chest resonance. I realise now that that’s not all that matters; there’s something else more important. By performing the vocal fry and blending in a bit of the chest voice, you get this very deep, rich and interesting sound - like a zip in a cello. It’s reminiscent of all the cool male speaking voices you can think of.

I think I know what’s happening now.

The technique called falsetto is usually used to mean a high register, but I’ve heard a better explanation for it: It’s more a tone than a register, and has to do with keeping the vocal cords loose, so that more air blows through them. You get a soft, airy sort of sound this way. And this tone can be produced at any pitch.

I think I’ve for some reason learned to speak with a sort of falsetto even at low pitches. It occurs to me now that it might be through not speaking enough… same reason we get unfit without exercise.

By tightening the vocal cords to get more of the fry, I automatically speak with most of the depth and hardness I’ve been looking for. It’s still a bit tricky - again, it feels like some muscles are atrophied - but it’s there. What it means is that the depth and resonance in my voice is surrounded by that gritty velcro texture instead of a breathy, airy one. It’s much easier to speak louder and more articulately, too.

I’m fairly sure this post is three times longer than it needs to be.

14 Jan 2010

Vocal progress

Some progress with the ol’ vocal apparatus.

I remember a couple of years ago I experienced a strange thing: I woke up with my voice deeper than normal. Considerably so. Now, it hardly seemed likely that it had broken again, so what was going on?

Over the next few hours my voice lost the depth went back to normal. I reasoned that maybe I was ordinarily tensing something that had spontaneously relaxed one morning. In any case, it sounded cool so I thought I should try to cultivate it.

Since then it’s come and gone every so often, but I think I’m finally getting a hold of it. I realised the other day that when I go to try singing something I have a habit of trying to force the sound from my throat. It feels sort of like you’re “moving” the sound backwards into the back of your mouth. I remember reading a suggestion to try the exact opposite.

By imagining moving the sound forward, so it feels almost like there’s a pressure behind your front teeth, it seems like the whole vocal apparatus opens up and starts working properly. That seems to be the key to the depth in my voice - rather than trying to “move” the sound deeper into my chest, if I do the exact reverse and try to project the sound out of my mouth it all seems to fall into place.

I tried singing a few notes today. Sounded deep and rich and interesting. An improvement.

2 Nov 2009

Voice test.

An attempt at Richard Burton’s reading of “War of The Worlds”.

Could be improved, but I can’t help thinking this is actually pretty good.

2 Nov 2009

Richard Burton reading “War of the Worlds”. It’s only the first thirty seconds of this clip I’m interested in.

I include it as an example of a fantastic voice. If only we all sounded like this…

2 Nov 2009

I’ve been experimenting with my voice recently, feeling out different pitches and textures. I’m putting this file up just for fun.

The first growly thing is not altered or effected in any way; my voice actually sounds like that, though it kills my throat… The words are just made up, vaguely inspired by something I vaguely remembered from Dante.

The second is a line from Muse’s “Microcuts”. This is my first time ever singing ever, so I figured I’d start with something totally unsuitable and out of my range :) Had to drown it in reverb, the tuning was so dodgy. This also kills my throat.